Communication and risk perception: A case study on radon gas

Main Article Content

Berta García-Orosa
Jorge Vázquez-Herrero
Xosé López-García

Abstract

Introduction: This research is situated within the study of risk communication in the fourth wave of digital communication. Radon is a carcinogen; over the past decades, it has been recognized as the primary cause of lung cancer among non-smokers. The primary objective is to understand and define citizens' perceptions of radon gas and its risks. Methods: We performed a case study of a highly affected community. The methodology used encompasses literature review and survey (n=185). Results: Although the main characteristics as a chemical element are known, almost a quarter of the respondents have incorrect perceptions about gas. In terms of knowledge of political and legislative action, the results point to gaps in respondents' knowledge. Respondents are mainly informed through digital media; however, slightly more than half responded that they had not received information about radon from any source. Discussion: The findings refine results obtained in other regions and indicate that the public is scarcely aware about radon, the media hardly cover it, and despite the perception of a health risk, it is seen as a distant societal risk, a factor that potentially prevents people from taking preventative action. Conclusion: Radon is little known by the public and has a scant presence in traditional and digital media, although news and communication are needed to raise awareness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
García-Orosa, B., Vázquez-Herrero, J., & López-García, X. (2025). Communication and risk perception: A case study on radon gas. Revista De Ciencias De La Comunicación E Información, 30, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2025.30.e343
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Berta García-Orosa, University of Santiago de Compostela

Professor at the University of Santiago de Compostela (Spain). She holds a BA in Communication Sciences, a BA in Political and Administration Sciences, and a PhD in Communication Sciences from the University of Santiago de Compostela. She has studied communication and politics for more than 20 years. She has collaborated in more than 50 research projects and international research networks. Spain’s Ministry of Education awarded her three 6-year research terms.

Jorge Vázquez-Herrero, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

Associate Professor at the Department of Communication Sciences, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC). PhD in Communication and Contemporary Information (USC). He is member of Novos Medios research group and the Latin American Chair of Transmedia Narratives (ICLA–UNR). He was visiting scholar at Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Universidade do Minho, University of Leeds, Tampere University and HU Utrecht. His research focuses on the impact of technology and platforms in digital journalism and narratives.

Xosé López-García, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

Professor of Journalism at the Department of Communication Sciences at the University of Santiago de Compostela. He coordinates since 1994 the Novos Medios research group (GI-1641 NM) at the University of Santiago de Compostela. He is principal investigator of the project Digital-native media in Spain: Strategies, competencies, social involvement and (re)definition of practices in journalistic production and diffusion (PID2021-122534OB-C21), funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ and by “ERDF A way of making Europe”.

Funding data

References

Barazza, F., Murith, C., Palacios, M., Gfeller, W., & Christen, E. (2017). A national survey on radon remediation in Switzerland. Journal of Radiological Protection, 38(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aa979a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aa979a

Bennett, P., Calman, K., Curtis, S., & Fischbacher-Smith, D. (2001). Risk Communication and Public Health (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562848.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562848.001.0001

Chiavacci, S. J., Shapiro, C. D., Pindilli, E. J., Casey, C. F., Rayens, M. K., Wiggins, A. T., Andrews Jr., W. M., & Hahn, E. J. (2020). Economic valuation of health benefits from using geologic data to communicate radon risk potential. Environmental Health, 19(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00589-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00589-8

Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (2017). Cartografía del potencial de radón en España. https://bit.ly/4n0lhHJ

Cronin, C., Trush, M., Bellamy, W., Russell, J., & Locke, P. (2020). An examination of radon awareness, risk communication, and radon risk reduction in a Hispanic community. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 96(6), 803-813. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2020.1730013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2020.1730013

Davydov, A. A., Biblin, A. M., & Kononenko, D. V. (2021). Radon risk communication issues: Results of the all-Russian public opinion survey. Health Risk Analysis, 3, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2021.3.03.eng DOI: https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2021.3.03.eng

de Vries, M., Claassen, L., Te Wierik, M., Das, E., Mennen, M., Timen, A., & Timmermans, D. (2021). The role of the media in the amplification of a contested health risk: Rubber granulate on sport fields. Risk Analysis, 41(11), 1987-2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13731

Esan, D. T., Obed, R. I., Afolabi, O. T., Sridhar, M. K., Olubodun, B. B., & Ramos, C. (2020). Radon risk perception and barriers for residential radon testing in Southwestern Nigeria. Public Health in Practice, 1, 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100036

Friedman, S. M., Post, J. F., Vogel, M. B., Evans, W. F. (1987). Reporting on radon: The role of local newspapers. Environment, 29(2). 4-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1987.9928854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1987.9928854

Hevey, D. (2017). Radon risk and remediation: A psychological Perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 63. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00063

Khan, S. M., & Chreim, S. (2019). Residents’ perceptions of radon health risks:

A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 19, 1114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7449-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7449-y

Kim, S., Brewster, M. S., & Schwartz, G. G. (2020). Communicating radon risk via a smartphone app: a pilot intervention study. BMC Public Health, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08677-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08677-7

Lofstedt, R. (2019). The communication of radon risk in Sweden: where are we and where are we going? Journal of Risk Research, 22(6), 773-781. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1473467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1473467

López-Abente, G., Núñez, O., Fernández-Navarro, P., Barros-Dios, J. M., Martín-Méndez, I., Bel-Lan, A., Locutura, J., Quindós, L., Sainz, C., & Ruano-Ravina, A. (2018). Residential radon and cancer mortality in Galicia, Spain. Science of the Total Environment, 610-611, 1125-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.144

Lorenzo-González, M., Ruano-Ravina, A., Peón, J., Piñeiro, M., & Barros-Dios, J. M. (2017). Residential radon in Galicia: A cross-sectional study in a radon-prone area. Journal of Radiological Protection, 37(3), 728-741. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aa7922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aa7922

Mazur, A. (2006). Risk perception and news coverage across nations. Risk Management, 8(3), 149-174. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8250011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8250011

Mora-Rodríguez, A., & Melero-López, I. (2021). News consumption and risk perception of Covid-19 in Spain. [Seguimiento informativo y percepción del riesgo

ante la Covid-19 en España]. Comunicar, 66(29), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-06

Neri, A., McNaughton, C., Momin, B., Puckett, M., & Gallaway, M. S. (2018). Measuring public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to radon to inform cancer control activities and practices. Indoor Air, 28(4), 604-610. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12468

Perko, T., & Turcanu, C. (2020). Is internet a missed opportunity? Evaluating radon websites from a stakeholder engagement perspective. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 212, 106123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.106123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.106123

Rasmussen, J., & Ihlen, Ø. (2017). Risk, crisis, and social media: A systematic review of seven years’ research. Nordicom Review, 38(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0393

Renn, O., Burns, W. J., Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., & Slovic, P. (1992).

The social amplification of risk: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01949.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01949.x

Ryan, P., & Muller, N. (2015). Radon Risk and Public Health in Vermont. Middlebury College.

Stern, D. I., Common, M. S., & Barbier, E. B. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development, 24(7), 1151-1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00032-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00032-0

Suess, M. J. (1994). Radon indoors: A risk‐based approach to health protection criteria. Indoor Air, 4(3), 197-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1994.t01-1-00008.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1994.t01-1-00008.x